PART II STATEMENT OF CLAIMS

 

GROUND ONE: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE

 

            Does Chapel rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice? Chapel rises beyond a simple miscarriage to the level of Dreyfus. Arrayed against him were false evidence, false testimony, lies, deceit, deception, corruption, betrayal, conspiracy and even cowardice.

 

            It began with a police officer who came one step short of discovering a major crime on the night of April 15, 1993, and a second officer who innocently drove by the scene at that time[1]. Both officers cowardly did not come forward. What followed was a precipitous arrest based on Chapel’s coincidental contacts with the victim, the hearsay prattle of the victim’s friends[2] and two identifications from a loaded photo lineup[3]. When, a few days later, the case against Chapel began to fall apart[4], it was rehabilitated by conveniently finding the victim’s blood in Chapel’s patrol car, almost by divination by a religious fanatic who felt he had the God given ability to ferret out evildoers, and who was terrified of repeating a previous transgression against another Gwinnett County citizen[5]. This was followed by the ruthless tactics of an ambitious district attorney who succeeded in delaying the trial of Chapel for two and one-half years[6], manipulated the testimony of witnesses[7], attempted to implant false memories in witnesses[8], solicited perjured testimony from at least one witness[9], lied to the Court and jury[10], blatantly hid critical evidence from the jury[11] and generally engaged in the misconduct that was necessary to illegally convict an honorable and innocent man[12].

 

Michael Chapel did not murder Emogene Thompson, nor did any police officer unless he was sitting in the left rear passenger seat in the victim’s automobile when she pulled into the Gwinnco Muffler driveway with a flat tire[13]. This petition is certainly not the place to try and solve this crime, but if, instead of engaging in outrageous misconduct[14], the police had paid any attention at all to their crime scene reports, including fingerprints and blood spatter in the victim’s car, an out of place cufflink on the left-rear-seat floorboard[15], and the nature of the relationships surrounding the victim, the real killers of Emogene Thompson would never have gotten away with murder.



[1] See Ground 12, A, 4 (a) “Stating The Honor Of The Police Department Has been Impugned”

[2] See Ground 9, B “Hearsay Evidence Of Friends Of The Victim were Improperly Admitted”

[3] See Ground 10 “Improper Lineup Procedures”

[4] See Ground 6, C “The Case Against Chapel Begins To Collapse”

[5] See Ground 6, D “The Case Against Chapel Is Rehabilitated”

[6] See Ground 3 “A Speedy Trial Denied”

[7] See Ground 5, A, 6 “Blue Light Activity In The Driveway, 10 PM And Later”

  And Ground 6, G “Attempts To Manipulate Firefighter Testimony”

[8] See Ground 6, H “Attempts To Plant False Memories In Witnesses”

[9] See Ground 6, J “Testimony About The Blood Spatter Evidence Was Perjured”

[10] See Ground 12, B, 2 “Misleading The Court And The Jury”

[11] See Ground 14, B The Prosecution Hides Critical Photographs From The Jury”

[12] See Ground 12, “Prosecutorial Misconduct”

[13] See Ground 5, B “Autopsy And Crime Scene Reports Prove Shots Fired From Inside Victim’s Car”

[14] See Ground 11, “Police Misconduct”

[15] See Ground 5, B, 4 “Discussion Of The Evidence”